Trampoline Park Labor Cost: The $14 a Sq Ft Nobody Budgets

Two 31,512 sq ft (2,928 m²) trampoline parks can differ by more than $300,000 a year in supervision cost. The local wage is the same. The floor area is the same. The variable is how much floor one court monitor is expected to cover.

At the national median wage for amusement and recreation attendants, a single post staffed for every open hour costs $72,389 a year in employer cost. Spread over a 31,512 sq ft lease, that is $14.48 per leased square foot, or 58% of what the average US retail rent adds to the same address.

The number never appears in a fit-out quote, a franchise disclosure item or a lease abstract. It arrives as 3,744 hours of part-time shifts rather than as an invoice, which is why it is so easy to underprice during planning and so hard to reprice afterward.

This article builds that number from published wage and benefit data, then converts it into cost per square foot so it can sit next to rent on the same page. Every input below is either cited or labeled as an assumption, and the assumptions are collected in the section on what the data does not show.

---

Why supervision never appears as a line item

Capital expenditure arrives as documents. A trampoline budget, a soft-play package, a 3D layout and an installation schedule all land in the same folder, all priced per unit, all signed before opening. Rent arrives as a lease with a rate per square foot. Supervision arrives as a schedule.

That mismatch of units is the whole problem. Fit-out is quoted per square foot, rent is charged per square foot, and labor is scheduled per hour. Nobody converts the third into the units used by the first two, so a large controllable operating cost is never compared with the largest fixed one.

There is a second reason. A monitor post does not scale with attendance. It scales with open hours and with the area that has to be watched. A quiet Tuesday with forty jumpers and a busy Saturday with four hundred can carry identical supervision cost, and the profit and loss account reports the two weeks as different businesses.

Treat supervision as a rate, the same way you treat rent: dollars per open hour, converted to dollars per square foot per year. Once it is expressed that way, three questions become answerable before the lease is signed rather than after the first winter. How many posts does this floor plan require, what does a post cost in this labor market, and does the answer still work at the ticket price the market will bear.

The unit problem in a sentence: rent is priced per square foot, supervision is priced per hour, and the two are never converted into the same unit until the accountant does it two years after opening.

---

What the wage data actually measures

The closest published occupational match for a court monitor is amusement and recreation attendant, occupation 39-3091 in the Standard Occupational Classification. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counted 397,830 people in that occupation in May 2025, which makes it the largest single labor pool a trampoline park can hire from.

The national median straight-time hourly wage was $15.46, and the mean was $15.69. The distribution matters more than either average. The 10th percentile sat at $10.75 and the 90th at $20.43, so the top of the market pays 1.9 times the bottom for the same occupation code.

Two neighboring occupations belong in the same model. Recreation workers, code 39-9032, had a median of $17.58 and a mean of $18.52; that is the pool most parks draw from for party hosts and program staff. First-line supervisors of entertainment and recreation workers, code 39-1014, had a median of $23.34 and a mean of $25.75. A shift needs at least one person at supervisor level, and that premium is real.

Read the state rows before the national one. California and Texas are both large trampoline markets with mature operators, and the median wage for the identical occupation differs by 39%. A staffing model copied from a Texas pro forma and applied to a California site understates a major operating line by about 28%, before any benefit cost is added.

One caveat on this table: these are survey estimates for establishments, not payroll records for your park. They exclude overtime, shift premiums, tips and any premium a park pays to hold staff through a weekend. Use them as a market anchor, then replace them with your own offers once you have made three hires.

---

Wage is not cost: the 20% you have to add

An hourly wage is what the worker receives. Employer cost is what leaves the business, and the gap is not a rounding error. The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes that gap quarterly in the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation series, most recently for June 2026 and released on 9 September 2026.

For all private industry workers, total compensation averaged $46.89 per hour worked. Wages and salaries were $32.82, or 70.0% of the total, and benefits were $14.07, or the remaining 30.0%. Applied directly to a wage, that implies a load factor of 1.43: every dollar of wage costs about $1.43.

That is the number most pro formas use, and for a trampoline park it is usually the wrong one. Court monitors are usually part-time roles. For part-time private industry workers, total compensation averaged $25.20 per hour worked, with wages at $20.15 (80.0%) and benefits at $5.05 (20.0%). The load factor for that group is 1.25.

Within that 20%, legally required benefits such as Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance and workers compensation account for $2.30 per hour worked, or 9.1% of total compensation. Paid leave adds another 3.6%. Those two items account for most of the part-time load, and neither is optional for a park that schedules people across a weekend.

The arithmetic that follows is simple, and the difference it makes is not. Take the national median wage of $15.46 and apply the part-time load of 1.25. Employer cost per staffed hour is $19.33, not $15.46. Apply the all-worker load of 1.43 instead and the model returns $22.09, which overstates supervision by 14.2% across every hour of the year.

Fourteen percent of a $70,000 line is not a rounding issue; it is a hire. The point cuts both ways for anyone building a pro forma from a corporate template, because a park that staffs with full-time year-round employees will genuinely carry the higher load. The question is not which multiplier is better. It is which employment model the schedule actually implies.

---

Open hours, not attendance, set the annual bill

Supervision cost is charged per open hour, so the calendar is the multiplier. Altitude lists the following hours for its Arlington, Texas park at 2216 South Fielder Road: Sunday 11:00am to 7:00pm, Monday to Thursday 10:00am to 8:00pm, and Friday and Saturday 10:00am to 10:00pm.

That is eight hours on Sunday, ten on each of four weekdays and twelve on each of two weekend days, or 72 open hours in a week. Multiplying by 52 weeks gives 3,744 hours a year for a single post that is staffed whenever the doors are open.

Apply the $19.33 employer cost per hour and one permanently staffed post costs $72,389 a year. At the park’s published 90-minute pass price of $19.99, that post needs 3,621 admissions a year, or 9.9 admissions a day, just to pay for itself before rent, equipment, utilities or marketing are counted.

That is the sentence worth carrying into a lease negotiation: one extra monitor on the schedule is a ten-ticket-a-day decision, every day, for as long as the park is open.

Extending the week by 12 open hours, which is two extra hours on five weekdays, adds $12,064 a year per post. For a park running six concurrent posts, that is $72,384 for the extra hours alone, almost the cost of one more post. Late sessions are usually justified by incremental admissions, so the relevant test is whether the extra hours bring in more than the posts they require.

The same logic runs by state. Using each state’s median wage for the occupation and the same part-time load, the annual cost of one always-staffed post ranges from $59,840 in Texas to $83,299 in California. The gap is $23,459 a year for every post on the schedule, so a six-post park carries a $140,754 difference between the two markets before it sells a single ticket.

Derived figures in both tables apply the part-time load factor of 1.25 to the published median. They are not payroll data from any operator, and the admission equivalents assume a single $19.99 pass with no membership or party revenue attached.

---

From cost per hour to cost per square foot

Cost per hour only becomes comparable to rent once it is divided by floor area, and that requires two inputs: how much floor a monitor covers, and how much of the lease is playable.

The building reference here is the Arlington park, which a Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation filing records at 31,512 sq ft (2,928 m²) with a declared fit-out estimate of $1,200,000. The filing does not break the area down by zone. For the model below, active play floor is assumed at 70% of the lease, or 22,058 sq ft (2,049 m²), with the remainder in entry, café, party rooms, circulation and back of house. That 70% is an assumption, not a published figure, and it is the first input to replace with your own plan.

Density is the variable an operator actually controls. One monitor per 5,000 sq ft of active floor is a lean schedule that relies on sightlines and camera coverage. One per 1,500 sq ft is a heavily staffed park with a monitor on almost every zone. Both exist in the market, and the cost difference between them is a factor of three.

The comparison line is the CBRE average US retail rent of $24.79 per square foot for the second quarter of 2026, applied to the full 31,512 sq ft, which works out to $781,182 a year. That is a national retail average and not a trampoline park comparable; a converted warehouse or a dead mall anchor will usually sit below it, and a prime suburban retail box above it.

Three conclusions follow. First, at the density most parks actually run, between one monitor per 3,500 and one per 5,000 sq ft of active floor, supervision alone costs between $10.13 and $14.48 per leased square foot a year. That is 41% to 58% of an average retail rent, spent on a line that no lease abstract records.

Second, the crossover is close. Supervision equals the average retail rent at roughly 10.8 concurrent posts in this building, which is one monitor per 2,044 sq ft (190 m²) of active floor. Denser than that, the people watching the floor cost more per square foot than the floor itself.

The third conclusion concerns pricing. If the park turns two paid admissions per square foot per year, a figure worth testing against your own pro forma, the 31,512 sq ft building sees about 63,024 visits. At one monitor per 3,500 sq ft, supervision works out to $7.24 per admission, or 36.2% of a $19.99 ticket, before a single front-desk, café or management hour is added. A park that sets its labor budget as a share of revenue is therefore budgeting for supervision before it has budgeted for anything else.

---

What the data does and does not show

This is a model built from public aggregates, and its limits are worth stating plainly before anyone puts it in an investment memo.

What the data does show. The wage distribution for the occupation a park hires from, by percentile and by state. The employer benefit load for part-time private workers as a group. The published open hours of one named park and the published floor area of the same building. The average US retail rent per square foot. Each of those is a measured figure with a stated reference period, and the arithmetic connecting them is reproducible with a calculator.

What it does not show. We have not found a trampoline park operator that publishes staff-hours per square foot, so there is no way to observe the distribution of real densities across the industry. The Bureau of Labor Statistics does not break trampoline parks out as a separate industry code; they sit inside a broader recreation category alongside bowling, skating and arcades, so the wage data describes the labor pool rather than this business specifically. Wages are survey estimates, not payroll, and they exclude overtime and premiums.

The density figures in the table are therefore scenarios, not observations. They describe what a given staffing decision costs, not what any particular park does. We do not know how many monitors the Arlington park runs, its filing does not say, and we are not going to invent a number to make the table look observed.

Nor is there a standard to copy. ASTM F2970 is the practice covering commercial trampoline courts and parks, and EN ISO 23659 sets safety requirements for trampoline parks; both are written as duties for the operator. We have not found a numeric monitor-per-area ratio in either scope document, and we would be cautious about any supplier who quotes one as a compliance threshold. Supervision density is a commercial and insurance decision, constrained by sightlines, zone layout and the conditions of your policy.

One more caution on interpretation. Parks with denser staffing are often parks with higher revenue, which can make density look like a revenue driver. It is at least as likely that high-revenue parks can afford more staff. The table measures cost, and cost is all it measures.

---

Four decision rules

Rule one: put supervision next to rent before signing. Convert your planned schedule into dollars per leased square foot and place it beside the rent figure. If supervision lands above 50% of rent, the staffing plan and the floor plan are arguing with each other, and the argument is cheaper to settle before the fit-out drawing is frozen.

Rule two: treat extra open hours as a staffing decision. Twelve extra open hours a week cost $12,064 a year per post at the national median. That is defensible if the late sessions fill, and expensive if they run at a third of weekday capacity. A park with six posts on the schedule is adding $72,384 a year for those hours.

Rule three: model the employment type you will actually use. Part-time load is 1.25, full-time load is 1.43, and the difference is 14.2% of the labor line. Pick the one that matches the schedule, and re-run the number when the state wage floor moves, because a 39% spread on the wage moves this line more than most design decisions do.

Rule four: fund the post from the ticket, not the party room. At one monitor per 3,500 sq ft, supervision costs $7.24 per admission. A park that prices a 90-minute pass at $19.99 is spending 36.2% of that ticket on supervision alone. Either the ticket reflects it, or the membership and party mix has to carry it, and that trade-off belongs in the pricing model rather than in month nine of operations.

None of these rules produces a forecast. They produce a floor: the minimum revenue a given floor plan and schedule must generate before anything else in the business is paid for.

---

How to run the model on your own numbers

The whole calculation is four multiplications, and each one has a place where an operator can substitute local data.

Step one: cost per staffed hour. Take the median wage you expect to pay, not the national one, and multiply by 1.25 for a part-time schedule or 1.43 for a full-time one. A park paying $14 an hour part-time carries $17.50 per staffed hour.

Step two: hours per post per year. Add up weekly open hours and multiply by 52. A park open 10:00am to 9:00pm seven days a week runs 77 hours a week, or 4,004 hours a year per post.

Step three: posts required. Divide active play floor by the area you intend one monitor to cover, then decide whether that number holds at peak. Annual cost is posts multiplied by hours and by cost per hour. The annual figure is what the budget needs; the peak figure is what the hiring plan needs, and they are rarely the same number.

Step four: convert to rent units. Divide annual supervision cost by leased area to get dollars per square foot, then compare it with the rent in the same units. This is the step that changes decisions, because it puts a number nobody negotiates next to a number everybody negotiates.

If the result sits uncomfortably close to rent, the design lever is zoning: fewer, larger zones under a single sightline reduce the number of posts faster than any scheduling trick. That is a floor plan question, and it is settled by the layout rather than by the schedule. Our 22,000 sq ft layout breakdown shows how zone count and zone size trade against each other at a comparable scale.

Get a free design and quote →

For a second pass on the fixed-cost side, the rent-to-admissions conversion applies the same per-square-foot discipline to the lease, and the staffing breakdown for a 785,000 sq ft park shows how one very large operator split roles across six departments. Both are useful cross-checks before you commit to a density figure.

---

FAQ

How much does a trampoline park spend on supervision staff per year?

At the US national median wage for amusement and recreation attendants, one post staffed for every open hour of a 72-hour week costs $72,389 a year in employer cost, including the part-time benefit load. A 31,512 sq ft park running between four and seven concurrent posts is therefore spending roughly $320,000 to $456,000 a year on supervision alone. The figure moves with state wages, open hours and density, and it excludes front desk, café, party hosts and management.

How many court monitors does a trampoline park need?

There is no published ratio to copy. Operators typically run somewhere between one monitor per 5,000 sq ft of active floor and one per 1,500 sq ft, and the choice depends on sightlines, zone layout and insurance conditions rather than on a standard. Model the cost of three densities before committing to a floor plan: the difference between the lean and heavy ends of that range is roughly a factor of three on the supervision line.

Is labor or rent the bigger cost for a trampoline park?

On the numbers here, rent is still larger, but not by much once supervision is counted properly. A 31,512 sq ft lease at the average US retail rent of $24.79 per square foot costs $781,182 a year. Supervision at one monitor per 3,500 sq ft costs $456,223, or 58% of that. Above roughly one monitor per 2,044 sq ft of active floor, supervision overtakes rent.

Do part-time staff really cost less in benefits than full-time staff?

Yes, and the published gap is large. Part-time private industry workers carry benefits worth 20.0% of total compensation, against 30.0% for private industry workers as a whole, which translates to load factors of 1.25 and 1.43. Of the part-time load, 9.1% of compensation is legally required benefits such as Social Security, Medicare and workers compensation, so it cannot be scheduled away.

What wage should I model for a new trampoline park?

Start with the state median for occupation 39-3091 and adjust for your specific market, then replace it with your own offers after the first three hires. The published range runs from $12.78 in Texas to $17.79 in California, with a national median of $15.46 and a 90th percentile of $20.43. Modeling the national median in a high-wage metro understates the labor line by about 15%.

---

Sources

1. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025 estimates for occupation 39-3091, Amusement and Recreation Attendants — bls.gov/oes/2025/may/oes393091.htm
2. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026, released 9 September 2026 — bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm
3. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, ECEC Table 5, private industry workers by bargaining and work status, June 2026 — bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t05.htm
4. Altitude Trampoline Park Arlington, published hours, pass prices and address, 2216 South Fielder Road, accessed 24 October 2026 — altitudearlington.com
5. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, TABS project filing TABS2026013038, 31,512 sq ft and declared fit-out estimate, registered 19 February 2026 — tdlr.texas.gov/TABS/Projects/TABS2026013038
6. CBRE, US Retail Figures Q2 2026, average asking rent $24.79 per sq ft — cbre.com/insights/figures/q2-2026-us-retail-figures
7. ASTM International, F2970, the standard practice covering commercial trampoline courts and trampoline parks — astm.org/f2970-25.html

All derived figures in this article, including employer cost per hour, annual cost per post, cost per leased square foot and cost per admission, were calculated from the sources above using the factors stated in the text. Assumptions that are not published, including the 70% active-floor ratio and the density scenarios, are labeled as assumptions and should be replaced with project data. For the safety and materials standards that govern the floor itself, see our safety standards page and our materials page; for the design-to-delivery sequence, see getting started.