Trampoline Park Wage Floors: Four Markets Moved in 2026

On October 1, 2026, the general minimum wage in Ontario, Canada rose from CAD 17.60 to CAD 17.95 an hour, an increase the province ties to its consumer price index and applies to more than 700,000 workers.

Nine months earlier, on January 1, 2026, the statutory minimum wage in Germany rose to EUR 13.90 an hour, with a further step to EUR 14.60 already legislated for January 1, 2027. On the same date, the minimum wage in California rose to USD 16.90 an hour, and in August 2026 the state announced USD 17.40 for January 1, 2027. In the United Kingdom, the National Living Wage rose 4.1 percent to GBP 12.71 on April 1, 2026.

Four jurisdictions, four statutory bodies, one direction. For a trampoline park owner, none of these notices is entertainment news. The wage variable in your supervision cost is set by governments, and in 2026 it moved up in every major market where this industry operates at scale.

This article reads the four notices as signals, converts each floor into a staffed hour and an annual cost for one supervision post, and ends with a budgeting rule for a 2027 build. Every figure carries its source and date; every conversion is shown as a formula, not a claim. No published dataset isolates trampoline park wages by market, so we use the closest official categories and label each derived number as derived.

---

1. Four Jurisdictions Raised Their Wage Floors in 2026

The four moves are independent decisions by four different authorities, taken under four different legal mechanisms. That independence is what makes them a signal rather than a coincidence. A single hike can reflect local politics; four statutory systems in three currencies moving in the same direction in one calendar year points to something in the labor market itself.

Three details in the table matter more than the headline rates. First, two of the four jurisdictions have already published their 2027 step, which means a 2027 pro forma does not need to guess. Second, the UK move is part of a longer schedule: the Low Pay Commission has laid out a path to extend the National Living Wage to 20-year-olds in 2027 and to 18 and 19-year-olds in 2028 or 2029. Third, the Ontario increase was deliberately modest at 2.0 percent because it is formula-driven, which tells you the mechanism, not the year, sets the pace there.

Each of these floors binds the entry-level positions a trampoline park runs its floor with: court monitors, party hosts, front desk and cafe staff. An operator does not get to opt out of the floor in the market where the park stands.

---

2. Why the Statutory Floor Beats the Survey Median in a Budget

The reference number most operators reach for is a survey median. The most cited one for this industry is the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 edition, which reports a median of USD 15.46 an hour for occupation 39-3091, the category that covers entertainment attendants and related workers, including trampoline park floor staff. We used that figure in our own labor cost breakdown, where it produced a staffed hour of USD 19.33 after a 1.25 benefits load.

A survey median is backward-looking. The May 2025 edition reflects wages reported for a reference period in 2025, and its next edition arrives with a lag. A statutory floor is forward-looking. It is law, it has an effective date, and in three of the four markets above, the next step is already published. For budgeting, the floor is therefore the only input you can verify before you spend.

The budget input rule: a staffed hour cannot cost less than the local statutory floor times the benefits load. If a survey median lands below that product, the median is not a floor, it is a wish.

There is a second reason to watch floors rather than medians, and it is mechanical. When a floor rises toward the middle of a pay scale, the whole scale compresses from below. A park that pays monitors 15 percent above its local minimum cannot keep that premium by doing nothing; the premium has to be re-established at a higher absolute level or accepted as eroding. Payroll systems handle this automatically and quietly. Budget spreadsheets do not.

---

3. The Compression Math: Floors Now Sit At or Above the 2025 Median

To see how far the floors have traveled, convert each one to US dollars and set it against the May 2025 US survey median of USD 15.46. Conversions use the Exchangerate-API rates of October 28, 2026: EUR 1 = USD 1.1143, GBP 1 = USD 1.3315, CAD 1 = USD 0.7122. The comparison is a reference, not an equivalence; each market has its own wage structure and price level, and a floor in one country says nothing about productivity in another.

The pattern is the finding. In two of the four markets, the statutory floor for adults already sits about nine percent above the median that a US survey reports for this occupation family. In Germany it sits at parity in dollar terms. Only Ontario lands clearly below, and Ontario indexes to CPI, so its position moves every October.

Compression from below then works on the rest of the ladder. The same survey reports a median of USD 23.34 for first-line supervisors of entertainment and recreation workers, occupation 39-1014. Against the national floor staff median, a supervisor earns 1.51 times the 39-3091 figure. Against the California floor of USD 16.90, the same supervisor median is worth 1.38 times the local floor. In a state where the floor binds, the supervisor premium the payroll can demonstrate shrinks unless the supervisor rate rises too. The same logic reaches party hosts, shift leads and the duty manager.

None of this means the survey is wrong. It means the survey is a photograph of 2025 and the floors are a schedule for 2026 and 2027. A budget built only on the photograph misses the schedule.

---

4. One Supervision Post: What Each Floor Costs a Year

The conversion from a wage floor to an annual cost uses one formula and one reference box. The formula:

Annual cost of one always-staffed post = hourly wage × benefits load × staffed hours per year.

Benefits load: 1.25, taken from the US Employer Costs for Employee Compensation series for private-sector part-time workers, where total compensation of USD 25.20 against wages of USD 20.15 gives a load of 1.25. This is a US figure applied to all four markets as a simplifying constant; employer social charges differ by country, so treat the cross-market rows as an illustration, not a payroll quote.

Staffed hours: 3,744 per year, the open hours of our reference park, a 31,512 sq ft (2,928 m²) Texas site with 72 open hours per week on its posted schedule.

Read the table in local currency first, then look at the dollar column. The dollar comparisons depend on the October 28, 2026 exchange rates and will drift with the currency market; the local-currency columns are the ones a budget should be built on. The two dependable rows are the ones with published next steps: California at USD 81,432 per post from January 1, 2027, and Germany at EUR 68,328 from the same date.

Spread over the attendance of the reference box, 31,512 sq ft at 2.0 visits per sq ft per year gives about 63,024 visits, and the California 2027 step alone adds about USD 0.14 to the labor cost behind each admission relative to the 2025 survey basis. That is small per ticket and material per year: USD 9,043 on one post, before the same logic reaches the other always-staffed posts on the schedule. If you run the same arithmetic against your own break-even model, the value you pick for the wage variable decides whether the result is a plan or a wish.

---

5. The UK Youth Rate Is a Scheduled Step, Not a Guess

The most operational signal in the set is not an adult rate. It is the UK schedule for young workers. From April 1, 2026, the National Minimum Wage for 18 to 20-year-olds rose 8.5 percent to GBP 10.85, the largest percentage jump of any rate in the set. The Low Pay Commission has set out a path to extend the National Living Wage to 20-year-olds in 2027 and to 18 and 19-year-olds in 2028 or 2029, conditional on economic conditions.

Trampoline parks are heavy employers of exactly this cohort. Court monitoring, party hosting and cafe shifts are entry-level roles, and in the UK they are commonly staffed by people under 21. Run the formula on the two UK rates and the scheduled step becomes concrete: a post staffed by an 18 to 20-year-old at the 2026 rate costs about GBP 50,778 a year. The same post under the National Living Wage costs about GBP 59,481, a 17.1 percent increase on that cohort whenever the extension lands.

The dates are not certain; the commission itself conditions the path on the youth labor market. But the direction is published policy, reviewed annually, with the two-thirds-of-median earnings anchor written into the government remit. An operator in Birmingham or Manchester who models a 2027 staffing plan on GBP 10.85 is modeling a rate that the government has set out to phase out for that age band.

For equipment buyers the connection is indirect but real. Every point of scheduled wage growth raises the value of layout decisions that let one monitor see more court. Our supervision blind spots analysis treats sightlines as geometry, not staffing, and that geometry is what decides how much floor one post can cover. A floor that rises 17 percent on part of your crew is a strong argument for spending design attention where supervision coverage multiplies.

---

6. Where the Floor Signal Is Weak

An honest reading of the four signals includes the places they do not bind. The most important is the United States outside the high-floor states. The federal minimum wage has stood at USD 7.25 since July 2009, and several states still use it unchanged. In those states the statutory floor sits far below what a trampoline park actually pays to staff a floor, so the floor carries no information about park payroll; the survey median and local competition for part-time workers do the work instead. The signal in this article is about California, not about the many US states with no meaningful floor pressure.

The second weak point is Germany. The Minimum Wage Commission sets rates in two-year cycles and its statute lets it deviate from its usual anchors when economic conditions warrant. The EUR 14.60 step for 2027 was decided unanimously on June 27, 2025, but the decision text itself notes it was taken against a backdrop of economic stagnation. A materially worse downturn before the next review would put the schedule under pressure.

Third, indexation cuts both ways. Ontario and California both adjust by formula, and formulas fall as well as rise. The Ontario increase of October 2026 was 2.0 percent because CPI ran at 1.9 percent. A disinflation year would produce a smaller step, or in principle none. The floors guarantee a level, not a slope.

Finally, the exchange-rate column of every table in this article moves daily. An operator who imports equipment, as most do, already lives with currency risk in the procurement line; the same caution applies to any cross-border wage comparison above.

---

7. What Would Prove This Wrong

The claim in this article is narrow: statutory wage floors in the major trampoline park markets rose in 2026 and carry published 2027 steps, and the direction of travel for entry-level staffing costs is up faster than the 2025 survey medians imply. Five observations would weaken or reverse it.

One. If the next BLS survey edition reports a May 2026 median for occupation 39-3091 well above the floors, the compression argument weakens; the floors would be chasing the market rather than leading it. The May 2025 edition is the latest used here, and its successors will settle the question with data.

Two. If the German Minimum Wage Commission, at its next review, deviates from the published EUR 14.60 path or defers it, the strongest scheduled step in the set disappears and the European signal reduces to the 2026 level alone.

Three. If the Low Pay Commission pauses the extension of the National Living Wage to 18 to 20-year-olds, the UK youth-rate step of section 5 does not land, and UK entry-level costs stay on the 2026 ladder.

Four. If disinflation pulls the indexed jurisdictions (Ontario, California) to near-zero adjustments for several consecutive cycles, the floors stay level while market wages drift up, and the compression mechanism in section 3 unwinds from the other end.

Five. If operators respond to floor pressure by restructuring into fewer, more skilled posts, the link between the statutory floor and total park payroll loosens; the floor would still bind hourly rates but would no longer move total staffing cost one-for-one. None of these observations has occurred as of the dates cited above, which is why the signal stands; any one of them is a reason to re-run, not to trust, this analysis.

---

8. The Budgeting Rule for a 2027 Trampoline Park Build

The four notices resolve into one operating rule and three work habits.

The rule: budget every always-staffed post on the local statutory floor, not on a survey median. Take the announced next step where one exists. In California that is USD 17.40 from January 1, 2027; in Germany it is EUR 14.60 from the same date. In indexation-only markets, apply the current floor and add a stated sensitivity band rather than a guessed percentage. Only where the floor sits clearly below the surveyed market rate, as in most US states, should the survey median be the primary input.

Work habit one: separate the wage variable from the load variable. Governments set the wage floor; the load moves with benefits design and local employment law. But your designer controls how many always-staffed posts the layout demands. Our breakdown of supervision blind spots shows how column placement and zone geometry decide whether one post covers 2,000 or 5,000 sq ft of active floor. On a floor-based wage input, that geometry is worth thousands of dollars a year per post.

Work habit two: price the compression into the ladder. When you build a pay scale, anchor the monitor rate at the floor plus a stated premium, then set shift-lead and duty-manager rates as multiples of the monitor rate rather than as absolute figures. Multiples survive floor hikes; absolutes get compressed. Compression also works on retention in your favor: our staff turnover breakdown shows what each departure costs, and a ladder with visible rungs is cheaper than one that pushes leavers to competitors.

Work habit three: re-run the annual post cost twice a year. The formula is one line: wage × load × staffed hours. The inputs change on published dates, October 1 in Ontario, April 1 in the UK, January 1 in Germany and California. A budget that is re-run on those dates is never more than six months stale.

The suppliers and lenders you work with already run this arithmetic on their own payrolls. A pro forma that shows the floor-based input, with its sources and dates, reads as a document written by someone who will still be operating in 2028. That is the impression that survives a lender’s diligence call, and it costs nothing but an afternoon with the four notices cited below.

If you are planning a build from design to delivery for 2027 and want the zone layout reviewed against the staffing model it implies, including where each always-staffed post sits and what it can see, our team will mark up your plan before you commit the fit-out.

Get a free design and quote →

---

FAQ

What is the minimum wage for trampoline park staff in 2026?

It depends entirely on the jurisdiction of the park. As of the dates cited in this article, the statutory floors most relevant to this industry are CAD 17.95 an hour in Ontario (from October 1, 2026), GBP 12.71 in the UK for workers 21 and over (from April 1, 2026), EUR 13.90 in Germany (from January 1, 2026) and USD 16.90 in California (from January 1, 2026). The US federal floor remains USD 7.25, and several states still use it, so two parks in the same country can face statutory floors 133 percent apart.

How much does one supervision post cost a trampoline park per year?

Multiply the hourly wage by a benefits load and by the staffed hours per year. On the May 2025 US survey median of USD 15.46, a 1.25 load and 3,744 staffed hours, one always-staffed post costs about USD 72,389 a year. On the California floor it is about USD 79,092 in 2026 and USD 81,432 from January 1, 2027. Every figure is a formula output; substitute your own wage, load and hours for your own park.

Does a minimum wage increase force trampoline parks to raise ticket prices?

No law forces a price, and we do not project prices here. The arithmetic gives a ceiling on the exposure: on the reference box of about 63,024 annual visits, the California 2027 floor step adds roughly USD 0.14 of labor cost per admission relative to the 2025 survey basis. Whether that reaches the ticket is a pricing decision that depends on local competition, membership mix and secondary spending, none of which the wage notice determines.

What is a staffed hour and why does it matter more than the hourly wage?

A staffed hour is what an hour of scheduled labor costs the business, including the employer-paid benefits and taxes on top of the wage. The US Employer Costs for Employee Compensation series puts the private-sector part-time load at 1.25, so a USD 16.90 wage is a USD 21.13 staffed hour. Budgets built on the bare wage understate payroll by roughly a quarter, which is why every annual figure in this article is wage times load times hours.

Which markets have already announced wage steps for 2027?

Two of the four markets covered here have published 2027 steps: Germany moves to EUR 14.60 an hour on January 1, 2027, under the Minimum Wage Commission decision of June 27, 2025, and California moves to USD 17.40 an hour on January 1, 2027, per the state Department of Industrial Relations. The UK has a scheduled path to extend the National Living Wage to 20-year-olds in 2027, conditional on economic conditions. Ontario adjusts every October 1 by its CPI formula, so its 2027 rate is not yet set.

---

Sources

1. Government of Ontario, Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development, minimum wage guide and rates page, rates effective October 1, 2026 — ontario.ca
2. Low Pay Commission (UK), “The National Minimum Wage in 2026”, published April 1, 2026, with the government acceptance of the 2026 rates, at gov.uk
3. Minimum Wage Commission (Germany), “Decision of the Minimum Wage Commission pursuant to Section 9 MiLoG”, June 27, 2025: EUR 13.90 from January 1, 2026 and EUR 14.60 from January 1, 2027 — mindestlohn-kommission.de (PDF)
4. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (Germany), “How much is the minimum wage?”, confirming EUR 13.90 from January 1, 2026 and EUR 14.60 from January 1, 2027 — bmas.de
5. California Department of Industrial Relations, Release 2025-118, “California’s minimum wage set to increase to $16.90 per hour on January 1, 2026”, November 24, 2025 — dir.ca.gov
6. California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement news archive, entry of August 4, 2026 announcing USD 17.40 per hour from January 1, 2027 — dir.ca.gov
7. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025, occupation 39-3091 (median USD 15.46) and occupation 39-1014 (median USD 23.34) — bls.gov
8. US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee Compensation, June 2026 release: private part-time total compensation USD 25.20 against wages USD 20.15 — bls.gov
9. Exchangerate-API, USD reference rates of October 28, 2026 (EUR 0.8975, GBP 0.7511, CAD 1.4041 per USD) — open.er-api.com